The outlaw Willie Sutton stole an estimated $2 million over a 40-year career robbing banks — and scored the ultimate “success” in his business, living long enough to die of natural causes. Sutton always carried a pistol or Tommy gun with him on jobs, declaring “you can’t rob a bank on charm and personality.” But the gun was never loaded, because, as he said, someone might have gotten hurt! And he became legendary, ironically, for something he never actually said. According to the story, Sutton was asked why he robbed banks — and replied “because that’s where the money is.” But in his 1976 autobiography, Where the Money Was: The Memoirs of a Bank Robber, he confessed that credit for the line belongs to “some enterprising reporter who apparently felt a need to fill out his copy.”

What does a depression-era bank robber have to do with taxes? Well, the IRS estimates that outlaw taxpayers cost the Treasury $385 billion per year in uncollected taxes — roughly 15% of the amount they believe is due under current law. So they work hard to close that gap. In FY 2011, the IRS employed over 22,000 revenue officers, revenue agents, and special agents. They conducted 391,621 “field” audits and 1,173,069 less-intensive “correspondence” audits. They filed levies on 3.7 million taxpayers and filed over a million liens. But they can’t turn over every rock. So how do they case their targets?
Earlier this month, the IRS released their FY 2011 Enforcement and Service Results revealing how likely you are to be audited. And even Willie Sutton would have appreciated the IRS’s “M.O.”:

• If you make less than $200,000, your overall audit risk is only about one in a hundred. (Of course, that average encompasses a range of possibilities. If you run a sole proprietorship in a cash-heavy business like takeout pizza, your risk may be far higher.)
• If you make over $200,000, your overall audit risk rises to about one in twenty-five. Obviously, the IRS sees more opportunity in chasing higher income earners.
• If you pull down over $1 million, your audit risk rises again to one in eight. Welcome to the 1%!

The IRS likes targeting entertainers, athletes, and other celebrities, too. Sure, it sets a high-profile example for the rest of us. But it’s also (spoiler alert) where the money is. Take Hollywood trainwreck Lindsay Lohan, for example. Google her name, and you’ll usually find it followed by “failed another breathalyzer test” or “missed her court-appointed community service.” But last week, Lohan made a different kind of headline. That’s right, the IRS filed a lien against her home seeking $93,701.57 in unpaid taxes from 2009.

Where does that all leave us as we move into this year’s tax season? Our job is to help you pay the minimum tax allowed by law. But we know the IRS is out to challenge us. So we don’t cut corners. We give you good, solid planning. That way, even if you do lose the “audit lottery,” you’ll feel safe knowing your savings are court-tested and IRS-approved.

The IRS is busy playing detective! But are they building cases, clue by meticulous clue, like the supersleuths of television’s CSI? Or are they falling on their faces like the bumbling Inspector Clouseau?

Last month, a federal judge gave the IRS permission to serve a “John Doe” summons on the California Board of Equalization, demanding names of residents who transferred real estate to children or grandchildren for little or no consideration. The IRS sought the names as part of a nationwide effort to find taxpayers who transfer property to relatives without filing gift tax returns. (The IRS had already rounded up information from Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington state and Wisconsin — but California officials objected that state law prohibited them from ratting out residents without court approval.)

Most people don’t know much about gift tax, for the simple reason that most people won’t ever pay gift tax. Gift tax law lets you give up to $13,000 per year to as many people as you like. Once your gifts to any single person (other than your spouse) top $13,000 in a year, you’re required to file gift tax returns. Your cumulative lifetime gifts count against your estate tax “unified credit,” which is the amount you’re allowed to leave free of estate tax. And once your cumulative lifetime gifts top $5,012,000, you owe a 35% tax on the excess. If you’re gifting to a grandchild or some other person more than one generation removed, you might even owe an extra 35% “generation-skipping” tax.

How does that lead the IRS to combing state property records like a sleazy private investigator tracking down a cheating husband? Well, transferring property into an heir’s name is a common estate-planning move. Let’s say you own a beloved vacation home, or a stock portfolio, and you don’t want to see it burdened by probate. You can just add your child’s name to the deed or account as “joint tenant with right of survivorship,” and at your death, voila, the property automatically passes to your child. But there’s a catch — transferring property like that counts as a “complete gift.” If that property is worth $1,000,000, you’ve just made a $500,000 gift!

This particular IRS “project” is already yielding results. The IRS filed an affidavit in the California case stating that they had examined 658 taxpayers who transferred property to relatives — and concluded that 238 of them should have filed Form 709 to report the gift. Twenty of those 238 were assessed actual tax because the transfers pushed them over their lifetime exemption.

This isn’t the first time the IRS has used the “John Doe” summons to flush out members of suspect groups. Back in 2002, the IRS subpoenaed MasterCard and Visa to find taxpayers using debit cards tied to accounts in offshore tax havens. And in 2008, they used it to find taxpayers hiding Swiss bank accounts. The Internal Revenue Manual puts strict limits on this tool. But if today’s efforts succeed in finding lost revenue, we can probably expect to see more in the future.

There are a couple of lessons here. First, many financial moves — like transferring property into your kids’ names — have hidden tax consequences that are easy to miss. And second, the IRS has more ways than you realize to find those consequences. So don’t take chances, especially when they might land you on the wrong end of an IRS subpoena! You know how the utility company tells you to “call before you dig”? Well, call us before you dig, and we’ll help you avoid all sorts of nasty surprises!

In a brilliant attempt to “reduce burden” for taxpayers, the IRS now has a new tactic for auditing small businesses. They now have Quickbooks and Peachtree software and are requesting electronic versions of accounting records for their audits. They have released further details to remind that it is mandatory that you provide your accounting records in an electronic format if they are requested. So what does this mean for you if use one of the off the self software packages for your accounting records?

From an IRS audit prospective, this means that the door will be open to analyze data much further to determine where they may be able to effectively find compliance problems (aka get more money from you). If they have the electronic accounting file, they can review the audit trail to see if anything was changed after the transaction was originally entered. They can tell how often you update your records. They can also see all deleted transactions. The problem is that they can start asking a lot of questions that are really out of the scope of what may have originally selected your returns for audit.

Here is the Q&A from the IRS on requests for electronic software records. http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=238525,00.html

Check out Question #6 from the IRS:

Q6. How will the electronic data be used?
A: Most accounting software programs can generate a large number of pre-set reports. Each report can be modified to fit the examiner’s needs. When working with these reports, the examiner can “drill down” to the underlying data and documents to further investigate items, as appropriate. The software also allows the examiner to test the integrity and veracity of the accounting records in making a determination as to the reliability of the records for examination purposes. However, the examiner may still need to request other documents when such records are necessary to properly test a return item or issue.

Wow I really think this will help speed the audit along and I especially like the “further investigate items, as appropriate.” That sounds so fun!

How about Question #12 from the IRS:

Q12. The accounting software backup file can contain transactional data for several years that are outside the scope of the audit. What, if anything, will the IRS do with that information?
A: If IRS is given a backup file that includes data for years not under examination, IRS will not utilize that data during the examination of the current year. If based on the results from the current year examination a decision is made to expand the scope of the! examination to prior or subsequent years, the taxpayer will be notified. The records may be utilized after that notification.

So they probably won’t expand the scope of most audits, right (Sarcasm)?

For most clients that we see, their Quickbooks file does not contain all of the transactions necessary to complete their tax return until we clean the file and enter adjusting entries. Many Quickbooks files we see have significant problems like negative accounts receivables, large balances in their undeposited funds account, and negative accounts payable entries. If the IRS gets their claws into these types of files, I foresee that they will be digging much further and causing a lot more time and money to be spent because audits will last longer and require more documentation and research.

So what is a business owner to do to protect from this unnecessary evil? Here are a few items to consider:

1. Business owners should stop and think about their own skills. Are their books and records really something they would want to turn over to the IRS in their current condition?
2. Most business owners are trying to use Quickbooks to manage their check book or maybe their receivables. If so, let’s talk about other solutions that may even be more effective. There are receivables-only solutions that can help more effectively collect money and expedite the collections.
3. Is this really an effective use of the business owner’s time?

Our firm offers solutions to remove the burden of bookkeeping from the owner and allow them to concentrate on making money and growing their business. We use professional accounting software systems that are not compatible with the IRS electronic accounting systems. The records will be accurate from the start and good planning for taxes can occur all throughout the year. We generally can assist owners with this process and show them how they can save more money than it costs to have this service.

Let us show you how it can be a win-win situation for you and if you are the lucky recipient of an IRS audit notice, we can make the process much smoother and less costly than letting the IRS dig aimlessly!